Most AI advice is generic because most of it is written without looking at your business. This is the opposite. I spend two to four weeks inside how your company actually runs, then hand you a ranked list of what is worth automating, what each one saves, and where to start.
Plenty of people will audit your business for nothing. It is worth asking what they are doing while they are in there.
I am paid to give you a diagnosis whether or not you buy anything afterwards. That is what lets the diagnosis be honest, including the parts where the answer is that AI is not your problem.
You end up with a written blueprint your own team could execute, with the reasoning shown rather than hidden. If you take it away and build it yourselves, that is a fine outcome and it is your document.
If you decide to have it built, the audit fee is credited against any project we start within ninety days. It is the first step of the work rather than a charge on top.
The length depends on how many people I need to talk to, which is also what moves the price above the floor.
Before I take up anyone's time, I build a picture of the business from the outside: what you sell, how you sell it, the tools you pay for.
A session with you to test what I have got wrong, fill the gaps, and agree who I should be speaking to and why.
One to one with the people actually doing the work. This is where the real answers live, in the workarounds and the spreadsheets that exist because a system does not do the job.
Everything I heard, turned into a ranked list. Each one costed in hours and money, using your numbers rather than industry averages.
The written deliverable, walked through with you live. What I found, what I recommend, and what to do first.
No surprises at the end. You hear what I am finding as I find it. If the honest answer is that there is nothing worth building, you will get that too.
One document, written for a business owner rather than an engineer.
Both are fine. The audit is written so either works.
The blueprint is yours. Hand it to your own team, or to whoever you like. It is written to be executed by someone else, with the reasoning shown rather than hidden, so nobody has to come back to me to understand it.
I build the top opportunities: agents that do real work, automations that remove the manual steps between your systems, or a full operating layer that runs the recurring admin in the background. The audit fee comes off the cost.
Built like software, because that is the difference between a system that is still running in six months and a demo that impressed everyone in week one.
Not a chat box that answers questions and leaves the job where it was. Agents with real access to your systems, that research an account, triage an inbox, or turn a call into a written record, then write the result back where your team already works.
The copying, the re-keying, the Friday afternoon spreadsheet. Automations with error handling and alerts, so when something does break you hear about it in a day rather than a quarter.
PDFs, transcripts, inbound email, invoices. Anything where a person currently reads something and types the important parts somewhere else, which is usually where the biggest hidden hours are.
For businesses that want the whole thing. It watches what is happening, drafts the work, and hands it to you to approve. A brief in the morning, the chase-ups already written, the monthly pack assembling itself.
Client names stay off the site on purpose. I will walk you through any of it live.
Built for a UK recruitment group. It handles the employer conversations and the first pass of every placement, and escalates to a human at the point a human is actually needed.
Built for one of my own products. Four data APIs and two models per request, scored out of 100, with a written report by email. Go and run it on a business you know.
Ask it something about how I work. It answers from real context, and when a conversation turns into an enquiry it writes the record into my CRM and pings my phone. The same pattern I build for clients.
You keep the diagnosis. It is a standalone document you can act on, with me or without me. Handing it to your own team to build from is a perfectly good outcome, and it is written with that in mind.
Usually three things. The recurring tasks you have stopped noticing because you have worked around them for years. The gap between how you think the business runs and how it actually runs. And which opportunities have a payback you would act on, as opposed to the ones that sound impressive and do not. If nothing in it surprises you, I would be surprised.
Through the model provider's API under commercial terms, and nowhere else. Access is scoped to what the job needs, credentials stay with you where possible, and I write down exactly what any system can read and write before it is built. If you have a policy on this, bring it to the first call and we design inside it.
No. It gives a small team the output of a bigger one without the payroll. Your people stop doing the grind, they do not lose their jobs. If a build only works by cutting heads, it is usually the wrong build and I will say so.
If nobody in the business spends real hours on repeated admin, there is nothing here worth paying for and simpler tools will do. Once you have a few people whose weeks are going on customer ops, research, reporting or data entry, it starts paying back. A short call sorts this out before anyone spends anything.
No. If you can describe how your business works in plain English, that is the whole requirement. The technical half is my job.
A short call. Describe the work that keeps eating your team's time and I will tell you straight whether an audit is worth it, and roughly what it would find. If the answer is no, you will get that too.
Book a 15-minute intro callPrefer email? sonny@weareapexai.com